-AB+APPARTS+method+primary+sources+response-

Hernan Cortes Conquers Mexico 8/25/09
 * A**-Hernan Cortes a spanish conquistador (1519-1526)
 * P**-Written October 30, 1520. Letter sent from Segura de la Frontera
 * P**-Cortes wants to get a lot of gold while with the Aztecs. The Aztecs are very civalized people. They believed he was a god because he had all the charecteristics. Later it wiped out all the Aztecs.
 * A**-King of Spain
 * R**-Cortes is writing to the kind of Spain to tell him about the Aztecs and what his journey is like. He says they are very hosbiltable towards the Spanish and he is trying to spread Catholocism. Cortes is also bragging about how they think he is a god and he will come back with a lot of gold for Europe.
 * T**-Cortes is trying to convey that he is doing well in Mexico. The Aztecs are very nice towards the Europeans and Cortes is getting whatever he wants. He wants to let the king know he is doing his job well.
 * S**-The source is important because it tells the view of Cortes who experienced it first hand. It is him letting his country know that he is controlling Mexico.

Aztec Chroniclers Describe the Spanish Conquest 8/25/09
 * A**-One of the witnesses of Sahagun
 * P**-1519 in the Aztecs town/village
 * P**-Cortes goes to Mexico and wants gold from the Aztecs. They believe he is a god and want to take care of him. He later betrays them and takes all that he can.
 * A**-The source is written by one of Sahagun's witnesses so the source is not necessarily reliable. He is writing it to himself. Not an audience.
 * R**-It was produced so the witness could remember what happened on that day. He was sad that the Spanish would do kill when the Aztecs trusted them,
 * T**-He is trying to convery that the Spanish disappointed him by killing the Aztecs without reason.
 * S**-It is important because it give another point of view that is negative. Unlike Cortes who made it sound like what he was doing was great.

Cortes conquering Mexico and Sahagun's witnesses story are very different but have some similar points. The events are different because of the point of view it is written in. Cortes is first person while Sahagun is more like third because he had a witness recording the events. Cortes was writing to Spain that all was well where he was and that he will send a lot of gold home. Cortes wanted to make the king proud of his work. Sahagun's witness told how it started off well but during the fiesta the Spanish attacked. It felt like Cortes betrayed the Aztecs and it was disappointing.

The most desconcerning memory of Smith's removal from Africa was watching his father die. He said his father was very big and a remarkable man. The memory of watching him murdered stayed with him. His master helped him adjust to the new world by trusting him. Smith became obedient and confident by getting trusted with hard tasks.
 * A Young African Boy is Taken into Slavery**

Specific protection of the Virgin Mary is stated in the laws. Nothing bad can be said about her. All the Jews and Atheists would have been fined and beaten if they did not follow the rules.
 * The Intolerant Act of Toleration**

Yes the compact is one of the first American constitutions. It forshadowed the development of the constitution because it was done by a group of people who wanted to work together. That is what later the constitutions became.
 * Framing the Mayflower Compact**

It reveals abour the Puritands do not except beliefs of others. Puritans are very strict and are very injust. It is injust because they would not tell her why she was banished and she was not able to voice her opinion.
 * Anne Hutchinson is Banished**